2025-06-17 Interview: Maria Berlusconi
The crisis of the academic disciplines, marked by their ever-increasing specialisations, leads to a continuous cycle of knowledge production that rarely leaves academia and remains confined within scholarly boundaries (Klein 1990). Extracting actionable guidelines and steps from current academic research becomes a complex endeavor despite the excellent work in various fields, like the idea of Planetary Boundaries (Rockström et al. 2023), linking the effects of climate change to the question of justice, or research in architecture that investigates the relationship of labour and extraction practices in Cambodia to uncover the western dependance on modern slavery practices (Brickell et al. 2018). Besides these examples that link specific topics to the social, there is a substantial body of research that focuses on solving problems without addressing the question of social relevance—a sort of self-referential work (E.g., Yoshida 2024), based on a dystopian vision for the future of humanity.
Fig 1: Azote for Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University. Based on Richardson et al. 2023, Steffen et al. 2015, and Rockström et al. 2009The evolution of the planetary boundaries framework
A growing number of sociologists, anthropologists, archaeologists, pedagogues, and architects (Braidotti and Hlavajova 2018) are starting to read their fields diffractively (Barad 2006), thereby (de)constructing epistemological assumptions about the colonial, patriarchal, and Eurocentric roots of their fields — a practice currently not present in vocational training in Switzerland.
Barad, Karen. 2006. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w.
Braidotti, Rosi, and Maria Hlavajova, eds. 2018. Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury Collections. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350030275.
Brickell K., Parsons L., Natarajan, N., and Chann, S. 2018. “Blood Bricks: Untold Stories of Modern Slavery and Climate Change from Cambodia”. Royal Holloway University of London.
Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Direktionsbereich Klima. 2025. “Kenngrössen Zur Entwicklung Der Treibhausgasemissionen in Der Schweiz 1990–2023.”
Hodder, Ian. 2011. “Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective: Human-Thing Entanglement.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (1): 154–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
2025-06-17 Interview: Maria Berlusconi
The crisis of the academic disciplines, marked by their ever-increasing specialisations, leads to a continuous cycle of knowledge production that rarely leaves academia and remains confined within scholarly boundaries (Klein 1990). Extracting actionable guidelines and steps from current academic research becomes a complex endeavor despite the excellent work in various fields, like the idea of Planetary Boundaries (Rockström et al. 2023), linking the effects of climate change to the question of justice, or research in architecture that investigates the relationship of labour and extraction practices in Cambodia to uncover the western dependance on modern slavery practices (Brickell et al. 2018). Besides these examples that link specific topics to the social, there is a substantial body of research that focuses on solving problems without addressing the question of social relevance—a sort of self-referential work (E.g., Yoshida 2024), based on a dystopian vision for the future of humanity.
Fig 1: Azote for Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University. Based on Richardson et al. 2023, Steffen et al. 2015, and Rockström et al. 2009The evolution of the planetary boundaries framework
Barad, Karen. 2006. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w.
Braidotti, Rosi, and Maria Hlavajova, eds. 2018. Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury Collections. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350030275.
Brickell K., Parsons L., Natarajan, N., and Chann, S. 2018. “Blood Bricks: Untold Stories of Modern Slavery and Climate Change from Cambodia”. Royal Holloway University of London.
Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Direktionsbereich Klima. 2025. “Kenngrössen Zur Entwicklung Der Treibhausgasemissionen in Der Schweiz 1990–2023.”
Hodder, Ian. 2011. “Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective: Human-Thing Entanglement.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (1): 154–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
Alessandro Tellini is a maker, educator, and researcher living in Zurich. His research explores knowledge transmission networks from a more-than-human perspective.